accessibility is an R package that offers a set of fast and convenient functions to calculate multiple transport accessibility measures. Given a pre-computed travel cost matrix and a land use dataset, the package allows one to calculate active and passive accessibility levels using multiple accessibility metrics, such as cumulative opportunities (using either a travel cost cutoff or an travel cost interval), minimum travel cost to closest N number of activities, gravitational measures and different floating catchment area methods. This vignette briefly overviews the package with a few reproducible example.
Before using accessibility please make sure that you have it installed in your computer. You can download either the most stable version from CRAN…
…or the development version from GitHub.
As of the time of writing this vignette, the accessibility package includes five different functions to calculate accessibility:
cost_to_closest()- calculates the mininimum travel cost to the closest n number of opportunities.
cumulative_cutoff()- calculates the frenquently used threshold-based cumulative opportunities measure.
cumulative_interval()- calculates accessibility as the median/mean (or any other summary measure, really) number of opportunities that can be reached within a cost interval.
gravity()- calculates gravity-based accessibility, taking a decay function specified by the user (more on that in a few paragraphs).
floating_catchment_area()- calculates accessibility taking into account the effects of competition for opportunities with different floating catchment area measures.
You may have noticed that we’ve mentioned a few times that the functions calculate accessibility using travel cost, and not travel time. That’s because we’re treating costs here in its generic sense: anything that increases the impedance from an origin to a destination, such as travel time, monetary costs, risk perception, etc., can be considered a generic cost.
floating_catchment_area() functions can use different decay functions when estimating accessibility levels. This decay functions effectively weigh the number of opportunities in a destination by a factor that depends on the travel cost between the origin and the destination. For convenience, the package currently includes the following decay functions:
decay_binary()- binary decay function (the one used in cumulative opportunities measures).
decay_exponential()- negative exponential decay function.
decay_linear()- linear decay function (weights decay linearly from 1 to 0 until a specific travel cost cutoff is reached).
decay_power()- inverse power decay function.
decay_stepped()- stepped decay function (similar to
decay_binary(), but can take an arbitrary number of steps, instead of a single one).
The users can also specify their own custom decay functions, if they need to use functions currently not included in the package. For more details on this, please read the decay functions vignette.
Enough talking. Let’s demonstrate some of the key features of the package. First we’ll need to load the libraries we’ll be using:
To use accessibility, you will need a pre-computed travel cost matrix and some land use data (e.g. location of jobs, healthcare, population, etc.). As mentioned before, travel costs can be presented in terms of travel times, distances or monetary costs, for example. This dataset must be structured in a
data.frame containing, at least, the columns
to_id and the travel cost between each origin-destination pair.
Your data should look similar to this sample dataset with public transport travel times for the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, included in the package for demonstration purposes1.
data_dir <- system.file("extdata", package = "accessibility") travel_matrix <- readRDS(file.path(data_dir, "travel_matrix.rds")) head(travel_matrix) #> from_id to_id travel_time #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cdb57bffff 5.8 #> 2: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cdb597ffff 47.0 #> 3: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cdb5b3ffff 48.0 #> 4: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cdb5cfffff 47.0 #> 5: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cd909bffff 64.0 #> 6: 89a88cdb57bffff 89a88cd90b7ffff 59.0
The land use data must also be structured in a
data.frame and must contain an
id column, which refer to the ids listed in the travel matrix, and the number of opportunities/facilities/services in each spatial unit. The sample dataset we’ll be using looks like this:
land_use_data <- readRDS(file.path(data_dir, "land_use_data.rds")) head(land_use_data) #> id population jobs schools #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 606 82 0 #> 2: 89a88cdb597ffff 734 308 2 #> 3: 89a88cdb5b3ffff 1670 100 0 #> 4: 89a88cdb5cfffff 1864 109 0 #> 5: 89a88cd909bffff 29 0 0 #> 6: 89a88cd90b7ffff 1117 480 0
cost_to_closest() calculates the minimum travel cost to a given number of opportunities. Much like the other functions we’ll be demonstrating in this section, it takes as inputs the travel matrix and land use datasets, the name of the column in the latter with the opportunities to be considered and the name of the column in the former with the travel cost to be considered. Additionally, it takes the minimum number of opportunities to be considered. Here’s how calculating the time from each origin in Belo Horizonte to the closest school looks like:
cumulative_cutoff() calculates the traditional cumulative opportunities measure, indicating the number of opportunities that are accessible within a given travel cost threshold. In this example, we estimate how many jobs can be reached from each origin with trips taking up to 30 minutes of travel time.
cum_cutoff <- cumulative_cutoff( travel_matrix, land_use_data, opportunity = "jobs", travel_cost = "travel_time", cutoff = 30 ) head(cum_cutoff) #> id jobs #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 22239 #> 2: 89a88cdb597ffff 36567 #> 3: 89a88cdb5b3ffff 42372 #> 4: 89a88cdb5cfffff 55571 #> 5: 89a88cd909bffff 26774 #> 6: 89a88cd90b7ffff 36991
Let’s say that we wanted to, instead, calculate passive accessibility - i.e. by how many people each destination can be reached within a given travel cost. Doing so requires very few changes to the call: just change the “opportunity” column to
"population" and set
TRUE by default) to
passive_cum_cutoff <- cumulative_cutoff( travel_matrix, land_use_data, opportunity = "population", travel_cost = "travel_time", cutoff = 30, active = FALSE ) head(passive_cum_cutoff) #> id population #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 62591 #> 2: 89a88cdb19bffff 180316 #> 3: 89a88cdb1d3ffff 185293 #> 4: 89a88cdb56fffff 162202 #> 5: 89a88cdb0afffff 243124 #> 6: 89a88cdb50fffff 107605
active parameter is available in most other accessibility functions as well (with the exception of
floating_catchment_area()), making it very easy to calculate both active and passive accessibility.
cumulative_time_interval() calculates the interval-based cumulative opportunities measure. This measure, developed by Tomasiello et al. (forthcoming paper), mitigates the impacts of arbitrary choices of cost cutoffs, one of the main disadvantages of the traditional threshold-based cumulative opportunities measure. Given a cost interval, it calculates several accessibility estimates within the interval and summarizes it using a user-specified function. In the example below, we calculate the average number of accessible jobs considering multiple minute-by-minute time thresholds between 40 and 60 minutes.
cum_interval <- cumulative_interval( travel_matrix = travel_matrix, land_use_data = land_use_data, opportunity = "jobs", travel_cost = "travel_time", interval = c(40, 60) ) head(cum_interval) #> id jobs #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 334406 #> 2: 89a88cdb597ffff 257648 #> 3: 89a88cdb5b3ffff 311264 #> 4: 89a88cdb5cfffff 385355 #> 5: 89a88cd909bffff 332576 #> 6: 89a88cd90b7ffff 373920
gravity() calculates gravity-based measures - i.e. measures in which the weight of opportunities is gradually discounted as the travel cost increases. Of course, several different decay functions can be used to so, each one of them with a range of possible different parameters. In order to accomodate such generalization, the function takes the decay function to be used as a parameter.
In the example below, we calculate accessibility using a negative exponential function with a
decay_value (usually referred as the in its formulation) of 0.2. Please see the vignette on decay functions for more information on the decay functions shipped with the package and how to use custom functions.
negative_exp <- gravity( travel_matrix, land_use_data, opportunity = "schools", travel_cost = "travel_time", decay_function = decay_exponential(decay_value = 0.2) ) head(negative_exp) #> id schools #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 0.03041853 #> 2: 89a88cdb597ffff 1.15549493 #> 3: 89a88cdb5b3ffff 0.56519126 #> 4: 89a88cdb5cfffff 0.19852152 #> 5: 89a88cd909bffff 0.41378042 #> 6: 89a88cd90b7ffff 0.95737555
floating_catchment_area() calculates accessibility accounting for competition of resources using different floating catchment area (FCA) methods. The FCA family includes several different methods, which can be specified using the
method parameter. As of the time of writing this vignette, the package supports two different methods:
"2sfca") - the first metric in the FCA family, originally proposed by Luo and Wang (2003).
"bfca") - takes competition affects into account while correcting for issues of inflation of demand and service levels. Originally proposed by Paez, Higgins, and Vivona (2019) and named in Pereira et al. (2021).
Please note that, since FCA measures consider competition effects, we have to specify which column in the land use dataset represents the population competing for opportunities with the
demand parameter. The function also support diferent decay functions. In the example below, we calculate accessibility to jobs using the BFCA method, considering that the entire population of the city compete for these jobs and using a negative exponential decay function.
bfca <- floating_catchment_area( travel_matrix, land_use_data, opportunity = "jobs", travel_cost = "travel_time", demand = "population", method = "bfca", decay_function = decay_exponential(decay_value = 0.5) ) head(bfca) #> id jobs #> 1: 89a88cdb57bffff 0.11894791 #> 2: 89a88cdb597ffff 0.24251324 #> 3: 89a88cdb5b3ffff 0.07459233 #> 4: 89a88cdb5cfffff 0.10470062 #> 5: 89a88cd909bffff 0.07549538 #> 6: 89a88cd90b7ffff 0.82935888
If you have the spatial data of your origins/destinations you can easily merge it with the accessibility to create spatial visualizations of the results. The example belows quickly shows how to create a simple map using
grid <- system.file("extdata/grid_bho.rds", package = "accessibility") grid <- readRDS(grid) spatial_data <- merge(grid, cum_cutoff, by = "id") ggplot() + geom_sf(data = spatial_data, aes(fill = jobs), color = NA) + labs( title = "Job accessibility by transit in under 30 min.", fill = "Accessible jobs" ) + scale_fill_viridis_c() + theme_void()
Luo, Wei, and Fahui Wang. 2003. “Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (6): 865–84. https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120.
Paez, Antonio, Christopher D. Higgins, and Salvatore F. Vivona. 2019. “Demand and Level of Service Inflation in Floating Catchment Area (FCA) Methods.” Edited by Tayyab Ikram Shah. PLOS ONE 14 (6): e0218773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218773.
Pereira, Rafael H.M., Carlos Kauê Vieira Braga, Luciana Mendes Servo, Bernardo Serra, Pedro Amaral, Nelson Gouveia, and Antonio Paez. 2021. “Geographic Access to COVID-19 Healthcare in Brazil Using a Balanced Float Catchment Area Approach.” Social Science & Medicine 273 (March): 113773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113773.